Search  
OAKBOOK
POLITICS  
 
 
 
Op-ed: The Parking Protest
Clinton Killian
Last Updated on August, 04 2009 at 02:26 PM

In order to close the City deficit, the City Council passed numerous tax increases and budget cuts. One that sort of slipped through - the parking increases - has caused a bit of a furor. The hourly increase has been less of a concern. The major concern seems to be the extension of the hours when the meters are imposed. 

In order to close the City deficit, the City Council passed numerous tax increases and budget cuts. One that sort of slipped through - the parking increases - has caused a bit of a furor. The hourly increase has been less of a concern. The major concern seems to be the extension of the hours when the meters are imposed. 

The neighborhood merchants associations in Montclair, Temescal, College, Piedmont, Lakeshore, Laurel, Jack London, Telegraph, San Pablo and numerous other neighborhood commercial strips say they're feeling the impact of the parking changes. In some places, it's just logistics. Customers have no way to get change to pay for the additional two hours.  Merchants feel that potential customers are simply avoiding the metered commercial areas to avoid the parking payment hassles.

The downtown commercial district has also been hard hit. Someone in a club, restaurant or theater has to be conscious of the time, otherwise they'll get a ticket. In addition, some of the machines only have a one hour park time, which makes it difficult for patrons to jump up and go feed a meter or move the car.   

This follows the insensitive City’s parking analysis that many of us have suffered over the years. For example, on Saturdays, downtown Oakland is virtually deserted.  The only people here are ones working. Many of the parking garages are closed and people are forced to park on the street. Yet, the city rigidly enforces downtown parking meters.   

Until recently, the City also would send parking enforcement officials to patrol the residential areas on Saturdays when synagogues and Seventh Day Adventist churches meet, writing tickets to church patrons while they are in service. Only sustained pressure from many of these has groups eliminated some of that disturbing behavior.  

Churches that perform Saturday weddings and other services get no break whatsoever from the City either. Even when they try to “buy” surrounding parking for designated blocks of time, say three-four hours, to hold a wedding service or other ceremony, the city has been adamant in its refusal.   

On Saturdays, the City also strictly enforces parking at the hospital emergency rooms. There is absolutely no logic to require persons that need emergency treatment to worry about paying a meter as well. I am sure in many emergencies, a person makes the decision not to bleed to death rather than try to hunt down change before seeking emergency services.   

This is no way to attract business and economic activity to the city. In all of our residential districts, many restaurant and shop owners have struggled to build a client base. Now that they have built a solid base, the City trips them up by putting these extensive and arbitrary parking enforcements in place.   

The City will make it difficult and many patrons simply will avoid using these areas rather than maintain a constant vigil to feed the meters. Most people do not carry eight quarters around. Try to find change near the Fox or Paramount Theaters or your favorite restaurant 

Everybody understands that the City is in a budget crisis, but the little money that the City will gross is outweighed by the extra expenses and simple aggravation costs. Raise the hourly meter, but revert the end time back to 6 p.m. so that our commercial district can continue to build their growing clientele. 

This budget crisis is far from over. Even though City employees, including the police unions, have taken pay cuts and set aside raises, it is up to the City administration to do more. They have to spend the time to review the City operations to update work rules, cut out wasteful spending and in general, be a better manager of tax payers’ dollars.   

The days that elected officials or administrators could simply spend public funds unnecessarily are over. You can only imagine the uproar that will occur the next time the Peralta School District tries to pass a parcel tax or BART requests a fare increase.  

This warning appears to have been lost on our current Council members. It would be a much better idea for them to get ahead of the curve and conduct a critical analysis of City spending and become better stewards of city resources. Our government must find better ways than simply raising taxes. 

One way would be to partner with the California Conservation Corp and brigades of young, unemployed people to clean our parks, recreation areas and others. We can look to the state and federal government to provide resources to combat our crime and make our city safe.   

Look at the example of the Downtown Oakland Merchants Association. You will see many people in brightly colored, easily identified uniforms patrolling the areas, sweeping the streets, emptying trash and otherwise maintaining this part of the city. Other commercial areas in Oakland are exploring or implementing the same program. The City should take the private merchants' lead and enhance these programs throughout the city to clean our park and recreation areas and our neighborhood streets. 

This budget crisis is going to require creative thinking to enhance revenues, a closer audit of city spending and resources to maximize their impact, volunteerism and partnership to provide basic City services, and more civic responsibility. In order to implement this new direction for city government, it will require new and innovative leadership. Lets see if the current Council is up to it.

 

              Clinton Killian is an attorney in downtown Oakland, an Oakland resident, a former Oakland Planning Commissioner. He can be reached at: (510) 625-8823 or email: clintonkillian@yahoo.com 


VIEW COMMENTS
 POST COMMENT
|
 EMAIL
|
 PRINT
|
RECOMMEND

Comments
More Parking Is Needed
I do not feel it is right for the residents of downtown Oakland to have to pay for parking till 8 o clock. My cousin live downtown and i go over her house less because the parking is so bad. There are to many apartments in that area and not enough parking. I mean what do the city expect people to do when they can't find a park within three to four blocks of where they are going.
By : Tatavia On : September, 22 2009 at 06:40 PM

Car owners are whining little babies
What makes you think that you have the right to rent a piece of our public space at a discounted price? If you don't want to pay your fair share for parking, ride a bike or take a bus to the movies. I swear, I've never seen a more whining, entitled group of people than car-owners. Just because you are too lazy to move around with your own body doesn't mean you should have cheap places to park your private property in a public space. How about, ZERO parking on Grand Ave? That's right. No parking spaces at all. urn it into a big plaza. People will come from all around to enjoy the public promenade freed from the domination of the pollution-spewing car addicts.
By : bob On : August, 10 2009 at 08:09 PM

How do meters hurt dining only at night?
Clinton, it makes no sense that extending meter hours hurts business unless you think all meters hurt business. In fact, it's the opposite - meters exist and were invested for the express purpose of freeing up parking for customers. SF's meters go until 7pm, Emeryville's operate 24-hours, and it simply isn't true that it's more convenience to drive out of town than to pay an extra $2-$6 for parking, especially in downtown Oakland. Drivers need to pay their fare share, and cannot have their parking subsidized at the cost of millions of dollars to the city of Oakland.
By : dto510 On : August, 10 2009 at 03:08 PM

Good point cleste3252
Need more dito510?
By : clinton killian On : August, 06 2009 at 01:41 PM

8pm metered parking hurts businesses
Thank you for your comment. Extending parking to 8pm is hurting. Want to see how: take in dinner, a show at the Paramount or Fox with drinks and dinner beforhand, or just hang out after work at one of the building client base bar or resturant in downtown. Each theater holds roughly 3,000 customers. Resturants a few thousand more. Do you think there are fee lots nearby to hold all? No. People must park on the street, sometimes far away, and now have to worry about feeding a meter until 8pm. Who carries quarters? are there any changing places? Going to walk back or get up in mid meal or show to feed a meter? Or risk a $60 ticket? Not very convenient. That is causing people to look elsewhere, to the determint to businesses building a cliente. So for a few extra quarters, the city is harming a budding restaurant/entertainment industry- at a time it cannot afford a hard hit! There is no parking turnover isuue between 6-8pm that extenting the time is correcting. Further, the BART anaology is misplaced. BART charges for parking at crunchtime, early morning commute; not after 11am or at night , or on the weekend. Besides commuter train station parking and urban commerical night parking is apples and oranges. Now stretch this draconion parking throughout each neighborhood retail district and you are driving people away. It is now more convenient to eat or watch a movie in Berkeley or San Leandro, another reason to avoid Oakland. Bye Bye Oakland dollars$$$ Raise the rate, sure; but extend the time? NO. Name another city that has citywide 8pm meters......
By : clinton killian On : August, 06 2009 at 01:39 PM

Subtle protest
When cities such as Oakland advocate such asinine moves, I always advocate for brick throwing justice. Not a riot, but maybe a smashed meter or two. Something to get the point across!
By : William Bixby On : August, 06 2009 at 12:38 PM

Drving Oakland consumers to other cities
Great article. I was shocked by how many spaces were available in Rockridge and the Grand Lake district this weekend. Our council's poorly conceived plan drives consumer dollars including my own to other cities. For instance I have already changed my nail salon from Oakland to Emeyyville - I go around 6 PM - I am not going to pay an additional $4 to get my nails done. It does not make financial sense. I also expect to see a rise in street crime this fall/winter as people park farther away to avoid fees. It will be sad to watch restaurants, theatres and any other businesses open at night struggle and or fail.
By : celeste3252 On : August, 06 2009 at 11:47 AM

Free parking means no parking
Clinton, what's the basis of your assertion that "businesses downtown have been hard-hit"? The vast majority of parking downtown is off-street and costs far more than the meters. It seems like some merchants are drawing some pretty strong conclusions from the last two weeks. Free parking = no parking. Just look at the suburban BART stations that, despite having far fewer riders than the urban station, never have any parking available when it's free. Extending the meter times should allow for more availability, and if a district has a lot of late-night business, doesn't it make sense to have meters go later? If the city starts to charge a price closer to the market rate (which is more than $4/hr), then the city can relax the time limits. But as long as street parking is artificially cheap, the city has to regulate its use to ensure its availability. It's really pretty simple economics.
By : dto510 On : August, 04 2009 at 05:14 PM
 
 
  OAKLAND
POLITICS

USEFUL LINKS
 

 
 
More on POLITICS...
Advertisement
 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Feedback |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 License.