Search  
OAKBOOK
POLITICS  
 
 
 
Council to Weigh New Cabaret Laws
Oakbook
Last Updated on October, 19 2009 at 04:57 AM

One of the biggest drags on Oakland’s art and café scene is the price of a cabaret license. Small galleries and restaurants can’t afford the $2,200 the city charges for a cabaret license. They then find themselves fined by the Oakland Police Department when they host events featuring music. A City Councilwoman could resolve this problem and make after-hours Oakland more fun and safer.

One of the biggest drags on Oakland’s art and café scene is the price of a cabaret license. Small galleries and restaurants can’t afford the $2,200 the city charges for a cabaret license. They then find themselves fined by the Oakland Police Department when they host events featuring music. A City Councilwoman could resolve this problem and make after-hours Oakland more fun and safer. 

City Councilwoman Nancy Nadel is proposing that establishments with occupancies of no more than 50 people be allowed to obtain a small cabaret permit for $600. According to a report Nadel submitted to the City Council, none of the 53 places operating now with a cabaret permit would be eligible for the new license.

The cafes and galleries seeking a small cabaret license have to have track records of being well-run and good neighbors. This is from Nadel’s report: “Establishments that would otherwise qualify for a small cabaret exemption but have a history of verified complaints, and would have a negative impact on neighborhood quality of life or public safety, including, but not limited to, continuing violations of state and local laws regarding public nuisance, will not be eligible for an exemption.”

Nadel is also proposing a late night experiment with longer hours for nightclubs and bars. The mandatory 2 a.m. closing time for Oakland’s drinking and entertainment establishments occasionally leads to throngs of rowdy patrons hitting the streets at once. This poses a nuisance and sometimes serious safety risks for other patrons, downtown residents and the police department. Nadel suggests that a maximum of 10 bars and nightclubs be allowed apply for extended hours permits as part of a two-year pilot program based on similar ordinances in San Jose and San Francisco. State law prohibits selling booze between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. but patrons would have time to finish their drinks and sober up.

The only part of Nadel’s proposed changes to the city’s cabaret laws that is not likely to be welcomed by club owners and publicans is an increase of the cabaret license renewal fee from $300 to $750. The fee had not changed since 1972.
 


VIEW COMMENTS
 POST COMMENT
|
 EMAIL
|
 PRINT
|
RECOMMEND

Comments
re:proposal is terrible
Cabaret laws are intended to regulate entertainment venues, not just large clubs. Oakland’s regulations may not be very flexible for smaller, non-traditional, venues, but that doesn’t mean that these should be given a free pass. If these small venues are totally exempt, the city loses a powerful tool for controlling problematic businesses. Now if you want to make the small coffee shop that doesn’t sell alcohol exempt, that may be reasonable, since it is very unlikely to cause problems. But having seen some of the crowds around some of the small clubs and art galleries, I think that the city needs to maintain some means of control. Nadel’s proposal seems like a reasonable start in modifying the regulations. Reducing the fee because there is likely to be a smaller impact seems quite fair. As to the cumbersome nature of getting a permit in Oakland, that is true for pretty much anything, not just cabaret permits. What is really needed is a serious effort at regulatory reform in Oakland to simplify the processes for everything.
By : Robert On : October, 19 2009 at 07:39 PM

This proposal is terrible and completely misses the point
Cabaret laws are designed to regulate large clubs with dance floors. The problem with imposing cabaret requirements on other types of venues is not only the cost - the process of obtaining a permit is an absolute nightmare. What nightlife advocates have been asking for for years is a clarification of the law that would state explicitly that it is permitted for bars to have a DJ playing background music, restaurants to have some live music to entertain their dining patrons, and a coffee shop to let someone play an acoustic guitar without a cabaret permit. This does exactly the opposite. It codifies a permitting requirement for the type businesses that have been asking for an exemption, and even for those that under current law, are exempt, and requires those businesses pay the City an annual fee. This is just another way for the City to take money from people.
By : V Smoothe On : October, 19 2009 at 10:45 AM
 
 
  OAKLAND
POLITICS

USEFUL LINKS
 

 
 
More on POLITICS...
Advertisement
 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Feedback |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 License.