Search  
OAKBOOK
NEW  
 
 
 
Oakland Bicycle Accidents on the Rise
Oakbook
Last Updated on February, 01 2010 at 03:57 PM
Perhaps it's all the construction on major arteries like Broadway and Telegraph Avenue, or maybe it's simply a matter of more bikes sharing space with more cars. If you've suspected that riding a bicycle in Oakland is an increasingly perilous proposition, the numbers back you up.

Perhaps it's all the construction on major arteries like Broadway and Telegraph Avenue, or maybe it's simply a matter of more bikes sharing space with more cars. If you've suspected that riding a bicycle in Oakland is an increasingly perilous proposition, the numbers back you up.

Bicycle-involved injuries in Oakland have increased by more than 30 percent between 2000 and 2008, according to data compiled by the Rand Corporation. Despite more bike lanes on Oakland streets, the number of bicycle involved injuries has grown from 120 in 2000 to 165 in 2008. Still, Oakland is not anywhere near as dangerous for bicyclists as Berkeley, which counted 180 bicycle accidents in 2008 with only a quarter of Oakland's population. Oakland's bicycle mishaps, however, are more fatal than Berkeley's. During the eight year period, 10 bicyclists died in collisions in Oakland while only one died in Berkeley. In San Francisco, where bicycle accidents have increased from 364 in 2000 to 471 in 2008, 19 bicyclists lost their lives.

You can learn how to ride a bike more safely on city streets by taking a free bicycle safety class offered regularly by the East Bay Bicycle Coalition.

County
Area
Category
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Alameda
Oakland
Bicycle Involved Fatal
3
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
Alameda
Oakland
Bicycle Involved Injury
120
130
129
131
141
118
122
164
165

County
Area
Category
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Alameda
Berkeley
Bicycle Involved Fatal
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alameda
Berkeley
Bicycle Involved Injury
131
136
129
143
119
132
147
134
180


VIEW COMMENTS
 POST COMMENT
|
 EMAIL
|
 PRINT
|
RECOMMEND

Comments
Ridership WAY UP means accident rate may not be higher
Cycling hasn't necessarily gotten more dangerous in Oakland, there are more cyclists. Reporting the increase in injury is misleading, here. San Francisco, over the bay has increased 53% just since 2006, according to the Metropolitan Transit Authority. If Oakland's ridership has increased similarly, that would mean that cycling is actually safer in terms of accidents per cyclist.
By : reZz On : February, 09 2010 at 12:12 AM

bike accidents
have just resumed bicycling after 40 year period of only vehicle driving or walking. bike lanes around here are intrinsically worse than no bike lanes. they give both the car drivers and the cyclists false sense of safety, leading one or the other into collision or the parked car door zone. given a choice between a coma and a fine, i'd stay off main streets and stay out of bike lanes. motorists on side streets seem quite tolerant and respectful of me riding in their lanes.
By : len raphael On : February, 06 2010 at 09:52 AM

bike lanes
I don't think it is wise to make the assumption that bike lanes automatically make cyclists safer, especially when we're talking about the type of bike lanes that put cyclists in the door zone, are used by drivers for double parking (or if they're wide enough, as a whole car lane!), make cyclists vulnerable to drivers turning right, &c. What makes cyclists safer, is drivers being aware of our presence, and smooth, debris and pothole-free places to ride. All the white lines in the world won't make me safe on the streets of Oakland if I've got to bike around cars lined up in the bike lane while avoiding giant potholes.
By : gem s On : February, 05 2010 at 11:06 AM

Many bike lanes are unsafe because they force a cyclist into the door zone and have more debris such as glass. I feel safer taking a lane because it gives me a wider berth in case I encounter obstacles. I am also more visible to traffic especially oncoming traffic. I see a lot of bad behavior by cyclists. Riding in the wrong direction. Not using lights after dark. Riding in the door zone. It would be useful to have more information concerning the cause of the deaths. Maybe it could help bicyclists from meeting the same fate.
By : oakland cyclist On : February, 04 2010 at 09:04 AM

bike lanes
Bike lanes _should_ lead to a decrease, but if there is a correlation, there should be a determination of whether there is a cause and effect. Or at least to determine if the increase in accidents are concentrated around the bike lanes. Not to get rid of bike lanes, but as a first step towards reducing the accidents. I can think of a number of potential causes for a bike lane increasing the accident rate. E.g. an increase in bicycle traffic, or the presence of a bike lane causing a false sense of confidence in the bicyclist or car driver, or even that by having a bike lane on a busy thoroughfare bicycle traffic has been attracted from quieter streets with less car traffic. Maybe the effect would be short term, or maybe there would be a mitigation possible. It is important to understand the reasons if we want to decrease the accident rates.
By : Robert On : February, 03 2010 at 06:38 PM

bike Lanes
Definitely not suggesting that bike lanes led to increase in accidents. If anything, bike lanes would make bicycling safer.
By : Alex G On : February, 03 2010 at 04:47 PM

Why the increase?
Has anybody looked to see whether the increase in bike lanes is causually related to the increase in acidents in Oakland and Berkeley?
By : Robert On : February, 02 2010 at 07:44 PM
 
 
  OAKLAND
NEW

 

 
 
More on NEW...
Advertisement
 
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Feedback |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 License.